Comments on: Give us your Vote

By: Ryan

Ryan — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:34:02 +0000

Totally on board with you guys here. I have been appalled at the constant request for shareholders to approve huge board salaries etc despite the value of our investments plummeting.
And I’d rather the cash to re-invest myself rather than leave it with the likes of Coe, with his stellar investment performance lately………

By: John

John — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 00:42:46 +0000

We have a proxy form which we intend to allocate to you. Should we return the proxy form to computershare or direct to you.

By: Ben

Ben — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:05:45 +0000

Greg & Steve – I recall you mentioning mailing infomation to all RHG holders (based on the shareholder register), is this still happening? I haven’t seen anything in my mailbox. You wouldn’t want to miss the opportunity to get your side of the story out to the voters before they start returning their proxies.

By: Russell Martin

Russell Martin — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:37:06 +0000

I don’t think this should be viewed as something that is being done for the sole benefit of RHG shareholders – it is an extremely interesting and educational process for shareholders of any company. Well done guys for having the guts and drive to go out on a limb.

By: Greg Hoffman (TII)

Greg Hoffman (TII) — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:51:37 +0000

My understanding is that once you’re the legal owner (ie after settlement date), you’re able to vote. So those buying the shares at the moment will be well and truly able to vote at the meeting.

By: Ron Turner

Ron Turner — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:29:09 +0000

Hi guys. I have a query in relation to voting entitlements. I notice a substantial increase in the volume of RHG shares being traded recently. My query is – at what stage does the share register close to determine voting entitlements? I appreciate that the share price is rising and some holders will be taking profits but I wonder who is buying.

By: asad

asad — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:22:45 +0000

I have only 2000 shares. but you have definitely got my vote!

By: John

John — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:52:04 +0000

You have my full support in your actions. 140,000 share involved!
Good luck.

By: r

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:51:12 +0000

“The directors consider it to be in the best interests of shareholders that these resolutions be voted upon at the next annual general meeting rather than a specially requisitioned meeting. Amongst other things, this will avoid the expense and loss of management time involved in having two meetings.”
Excerpted fromRHG ASX announcement 18/09/09

Controlling expenses for meetings is offered as a reason to not meet – if the outcome includes potentially an upset to the current status quo of the current club of boardmembers. Coe needs to go.

Greg and Steve, you have my vote.

By: john

john — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:20:20 +0000

I have just read the release of 18th Sept from RHG. If the notice is deficient, i suggest fix the deficiency and still call the meeting. Don’t be ambushed by the suggestion of you two going on Bd as additional. You will be 2 out of 6 and Coe will still be there. No good. press on with the original suggestion, as you now have them running scared.
PS I love the crocodile tears of reducing the expense of a special meeting. The best way of reducing expense is to sack Coe.
All the best.