Here is the resume we sent across for Greg. We tried to highlight some of the areas we thought Greg could add to the existing board. I have to be honest, though, I didn’t expect them to send it out …
Print This Post
Greg Hoffman’s rejected resume
Print This Post
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
Hi Greg & Steve,
So what is going to happen now? It was all that a missed opportunity, or is there a way to still elect you both? Were both CV’s been rejected or only Greg’s?
Would you Steve still stand for the board if you are the only one elligible?
I haven’t read any more comments about this campaign, therefore it would be great to get an udate from you guys. I don’t believe I am the only shareholder keen for one.
Thank you for all your efforts and hopefully it will be good news for all of us,
Mark
[Reply]
My understanding is that Greg and Steven’s CVs were for the board’s eyes and in rejecting the CVs, the board has said they will not support Greg and Steven’s candidature and instead, will support David Coe’s re-election. Giving the board their CVs was a futile but necessary piece of procedure, and you can read the CVs yourself on this site anyway. There is no need for RHG to publish the CVs.
As you and I know, it is not the board that matters so much as the shareholders. Of course, Kinghorn is himself a shareholder, as is RHG’s CEO with a brand new 6% stake or thereabouts in the business as of weeks ago. How nice of him to finally join us. Both Greg and Steven will be standing for election, and David Coe for re-election. Votes are all that matters in the coming AGM, so be there and cast your vote! Or assign your vote to Steven as the proxy.
[Reply]